Meet Joe Simitian, Silicon Valley’s Surveillance Technology Watchdog

The Californian has drafted the strictest proposal yet that would require police forces to get explicit permission for new surveillance tech

Written by  in Palo Alto, California @dannyyadron

One of the broadest pushes to reel in America’s surveillance state isn’t in Congress, the White House or a courtroom; arguably it’s in Joe Simitian’s office in California’s Santa Clara County government building.

Simitian – 63 and bespectacled – is a supervisor on the county board here. This winter he drafted a proposal for regulation that would require local law enforcement to justify each time they use any piece of surveillance technology – fake cellphone towers, computer hacks, license plate readers, GPS trackers, or anything else that helps cops track civilians.

The police aren’t his biggest fans. Simitian has spent the past year trying to slow the sheriff’s purchase of new gadgets, and describes the relationship as having a “healthy tension”.

“I am perpetually the guy at our board meetings saying, ‘I just want to be mindful of …’” he told the Guardian. “People talk about the importance of constitutional rights, but somehow this one just seems to have taken a back seat to others.”

Privacy advocates say the Santa Clara regulation would be one of the broadest anti-surveillance measures being considered anywhere in the US. As Washington remains deadlocked over how to put a leash on an ever-growing list of surveillance technology used by state and local police departments, it will probably be up to city councils and county boards to play watchdog.

The Counted: people killed by police in the United States – interactive
The Guardian has been counting the people killed by US law enforcement agencies since 2015. Read their stories and contribute to our ongoing, crowdsourced project
Read more
That can be a daunting task for local politicians who often have little technical experience and are more focused on dangerous intersections and village planning.

Based in Silicon Valley, Simitian might be a special case. He’s been close to technology since his mother helped program computers with punched cards. At one point she worked at North American Aerospace Defense Command in Colorado Springs. He also has an interest in non-parochial issues. The bookshelf in his office includes treatises on recent foreign conflicts – With The Contras – and most of the autobiographies to come out of the Bush and Obama administrations.

If privacy is a passion, he doesn’t show it verbally. In conversation and at board meetings he speaks in a steady, even cadence. He’s also prone to unprompted anecdotes.


Like this one: just before he joined the state assembly in 2000, an employee at the local Microsoft campus asked him for his thoughts on privacy legislation. Simitian said his first response was that he thought that was something handled by Washington DC. The room laughed.

Since then, his policy efforts have donned a tin foil hat.

In 2001, he introduced what would become the first data breach disclosure law in the US where if hackers steal a company’s data, the firm has to notify affected consumers. Since then, 46 states have followed suit.

Google was affected by his 2003 law that requires companies that collect personal data to clearly post a privacy policy. And thanks to him, California in 2008 became one of four states to outlaw the mandatory implantation of a radio frequency identity chip under someone’s skin.

As he paged over a binder of county documents and news clippings related to privacy, Simitian acknowledged, “these issues seem a little abstract when you’re in the middle of a recession”.

But he said that someone has to remain on guard. If the electorate waits to care about privacy only after it’s gone, it’s probably too late, he said.

“This is not something that happens overnight,” Simitian said. “This is a steady drip of the erosion of the right to privacy.”